The Numbing Effect
As I have learned throughout the semester, desensitization can result from consuming media that was once shocking to us as consumers. Seeing similar images again and again causes us to simply get used to what we have observed. I found myself in Dr. Laura Triplett’s class nodding in agreement that violence in films desensitizes its viewers to violence both on screen and in “real life”; yet, I engaged in my very own self-serving bias when I rationalized that it was other movie-goers that were affected, not I. It was not until one particular lecture several weeks into the semester that I realized the impact violence in film has had on me, or rather, how little I am fazed by violence in films. As I recall, the class watched a clip of Saw V, i
n which a man and women had to sever their hands to save themselves in one of “Jigsaw’s” evil games. At the end of the clip I found myself completely unmoved either way by the violence I had just witnessed. “That’s it?” I thought. “That was nothing compared to the scenes from Saw III.”
What did my indifference reveal about myself and the way(s) I have been affected by violence in film? Could it have been that I simply understood scary movies are not reality, and I separated fact from fiction? I am quick to say yes. However, when the first Saw film was released in 2004 and the second in 2005, I was absolutely shocked and horrified. I often had to turn away for a moment during some of the more gruesome scenes when I first watched those two releases. The acting in Saw V was equal to that of the earlier releases (subpar), yet this time the film had less of an emotional impact on me.
It seems that today horror films only become more and more disturbing, perhaps to cater to an audience that has become severely desensitized to the multitude of violent images they are exposed to. One study found that, “boys who are heavy television watchers show lower than average physiological arousal in response to new scenes of violence” (Huesmann, 1996). The concept is simple, the more we consume violent media, the more we become comfortable we become with images of violence.
Even more frightening than desensitization is the prospect of teaching children that violence in the media is an accurate portrayal of what occurs in the reality. “Studies have shown that many of them think cartoons and other fantasy shows depict life as it really is” (Huesmann, 1996). I can personally relate to this seeing how when I was younger I would leave the
movie theater frightened, thinking the villain from the film would jump out and get me. The thoughts lingered even as I entered my home, and I slept fully convinced that the monster or “bad guy” was just outside of my door or in my closet.
While desensitization will be very difficult to overcome, we can resist becoming even more desensitized if do not passively consume this type of media. Understanding the dreadfulness of the images we see instead of unreceptively viewing violent films can help keep things into perspective. Furthermore, separating fantasy from reality is essential; it would be a terrible thing for violent images to become so commonplace that we do not give importance to violence in the real world where it destroys lives.
Huesmann, L. Rowell, and Jessica Moise. “Media violence: A demonstrated public health threat to children.” Harvard Mental Health Letter 12.12 (June 1996): 5. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. 1 May 2009 .
Add comment May 4, 2009
melissabibeau
Tags: child's play, chucky, Desensitization, desensitize, film, media, movie, saw, saw V, violence
Booty, Booty, Booty, Booty, Rockin’ Everywhere
* These videos may be considered offensive to some viewers; however, I am using them to illustrate a point.
While browsing YouTube, I fell upon a clip of a young woman whose entire YouTube account is devoted to posting videos of her “booty shaking” in front of a camera. No, I’m not naïve. I know these videos are everywhere — but as I browsed through other clips young females booty shaking, I couldn’t help but wonder what goes through their heads. These are not strip tease videos that were unintentionally leaked by a bitter ex. These are videos posted by the dancer for …. fame? Male attention? Self-esteem? Maybe for all of these reasons. Although I will never understand the older women who are participating in this behavior, they are not my concern. It is the young girls (some I would even place in their early to mid-teens) who do not yet understand the ramifications of their actions. More often than not, when something finds its way on the internet, it IS staying there. It is there for your next boyfriend, your future bosses, your family, and your unborn children.
Several of the videos reminded me of Jean Kilbourne’s Killing Us Softly films in which she describes the objectification and “dismemberment” of women in advertisements. The following exemplifies this concept as this woman is reduced to only one particular part of her body. No face here.
Here is one of a girl who looks rather young. There are many other girls who are even younger and more exposed than this particular dancer, but I did not feel comfortable displaying their videos.
Don’t tell me that songs/music videos like “She Got a Donk“, “My Humps“, and “Pop, Lock, and Drop It” do not have an impact on young viewers.
I remember watching music videos as a kid and attempting to learn the moves of my favorite artists. I especially remember trying to sing and dance like Janet Jackson in her ”If” video.
I was nine years old when this song was released, and I knew her moves were “sexy” but it was not until much later that I realized how provocative this video was for its time. I can still picture her groping a male dancer, rolling his head around then shoving it towad her crotch.
Add comment May 7, 2009
melissabibeau
Tags: Booty, jean kilbourne, killing us softly, shake, shaking, youtube
Say It Ain’t So, Disney
Add comment May 5, 2009
melissabibeau
Tags: animation, Disney, recycle, recycled
Disney’s Broken Promises
My sister and I used to dress up and pretend to be princesses. We would fight over which Disney princess was the best and rank the most handsome prince. Of course our opinions changed with the introduction of new Disney movies and its characters. One year it was Sleeping Beauty, the next Beauty and the Beast. Many of the expectations I gained while watching Disney movie after Disney movie became more unrealistic as I eventually came to the conclusion that a prince could (and would) come and take me away to places I had only dreamed of. I always wished for an exciting whirlwind romance, and I was terribly disappointed when I realized it was unlikely a mate would sweep me off of my feet and show me a “whole new world.”
Just like Princess Jasmine in Disney’s Aladdin, I was living my ho-hum life (at the ripe age of 10) waiting for my prince to thrill me, excite my world. Steinberg and Kincheloe, authors of Kinderculture, explain that “Jasmine’s life is almost completely defined by men, and in the end her happiness is ensured by Aladdin, who finally is given permission to marry her.” (59) I believe evolution is a motivator in my mate selection as I am naturally impulsive and curious. By biological anthropologist Helen Fisher’s definition I had the biological making of the explorer love type. As an explorer, I sought a mate who could feed my wild side, and discover new things with me. Perhaps that is why I leaned toward the Disney princesses who were a little more adventurous. However, I find it impossible to take the position that biology is the only motivator in my love life and the expectations I held since childhood.
Romance in the media can leave you feeling empty when you do not have a partner or can even disappoint you with your current partner if he/she does not exhibit the same level of affection exhibited by the characters you see on the big screen. It can reassure you at times that your significant other is on the right track. “Aww, he’s done that for me before.” Or you can be left feeling dissatified with their performance. “You don’t ever do anything romantic like that.” Although biology is an important factor in how I ultimately chose my compatible mate, I do not subscribe to the notion that society and the media had little to no impact on my mate selection. Biology may have determined my supposed love type, but it is the media (more specifically Disney movies) that has given me reason to believe from a young age that I would fall in love in some exhilarating fashion.
Not only did I learn more about the type of mate I wanted for myself, I also learned more about the kind of girlfriend or spouse I wanted to be for my mate. Kind, polite, agreeable. Naturally loud and opinionated I tried to tone down some of my natural-born characteristics in early relationships so as to appear more lady-like — More demure like a princess. Steinberg and Kincheloe, argue that Disney movies alone impact children in a number of ways, including how little girls define their personal gender roles. “All of the women in these [Disney] films are ultimately subordinate to men and define their sense of power and desire almost exclusively in terms of dominate male narritaves.” (58)
Society continues to influence my relational development because it is often society and/or the media that help me gauge the level of happiness I have with my partner. Anyone who feels society plays no role in the level of satisfaction with their partner must examine how happy they would feel if their partner did not display any romantic gestures on Valentine’s day. I speculate most in a relationship, particularly women, would feel slighted. We as humans might never shake the impact the media has on own views of relationships or even ourselves as we look around us to help define where we stand. What is important is that we do not take away from these forms of media unrealistic standards of romance that set us up for disappointment or take us away from our true selves.
Shirley R. Steinberg and Joe L. Kincheloe. Kinderculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 2004
Add comment March 2, 2009
melissabibeau
Tags: Aladdin, Disney, expectation, helen fisher, kinderculture, love, love type, media, princess jasmin, romance
I grew up watching characters such as Roseanne Conner from Roseanne who put it all out, always saying exactly what the rest of us at home were thinking, only better. Oh, how I always wished to have the nerve of that lady. I took pleasure in having an “excuse” to say what I really wanted to say for once. For a minute I almost convinced myself I was performing a public service by informing people of their discourteous behavior until I remembered how irritated I would be if every move I made were outwardly judged by strangers. For now, I will keep my criticisms where they belong, in my head.